JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 28, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • Autorización a EPS para entregar informe físico y magnético sobre recobros glosados en cumplimiento de la sentencia T-760/08 en nuevo plazo
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida
  • Seguimiento a la orden vigésima quinta de la Sentencia T-760 de 2008
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se autoriza a SELVASALUD E.P.S S entregar la información requerida en el ordinal primero del A065/14, dentro de los tres días siguientes al recibo de la comunicación de esta providencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Autorizar a Selvasalud EPS-S para que entregue la informacion requerida en el ordinal
  2. primero. del Auto 065 de 2014, dentro de los tres (3) dias siguientes al recibo de la comunicacion de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a comunicar la presente decision, adjuntando copia de la misma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.